Re: acl question

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 05:23:24PM +0100, Frédéric Goudal wrote:

I’m working on the acl on my ldap, and I have found a rule that puzzle me on it’s last statement :

by * +0 break

Well as 0 means no access what does +0 mean ? On my opinion it does nothing and the statement is equivalent to :

by * break

Am I correct or do I miss something ?

Hi Frédéric, yes, they should be equivalent - the person/software that created them probably wanted to avoid access being set back to "none" here or just wanted to be a little more explicit about the same.

Regards,