23 Jun
2010
23 Jun
'10
7:53 a.m.
--On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:26 PM +1000 Nick Urbanik nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au wrote:
There is no need to stop the first consumer when running slapcat.
This puzzles me; with hundreds of updates happening per minute, some changes will be missed during the slapcat. Will syncrepl cope and make the new slave identical to the master?
That is the point of how syncrepl operates.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration