Re: [Fwd: Support for ordering matching rules in extensible match filters?]

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

--On Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:15 PM +0200 deepee@gmx.net wrote:

...

Could someone please explain to me why openldap currently doesn't support for example 'caseIgnoreOrderingMatch' (which is listed in section 4.2 of RFC4517) in extensible match filters? Of course I've seen the two SHOULDs above - I just don't understand the openldap related technical/design decision regarding the missing support and would be very happy if someone could please explain this to me.

Probably no one has implemented them previously. You could file an ITS with your contribution for consideration at http://www.openldap.org/its. Make sure you read the contribution guidelines:

http://www.openldap.org/devel/contributing.html

Ok, I've filed an ITS. Its ID is 6532.