24 May
2016
24 May
'16
5:10 a.m.
On Thu, 19 May 2016 at 3:10pm, Howard Chu wrote:
The contextCSN is used in replication, but it does not get replicated itself. Each replica maintains its own.
I was testing my partial replication against my test MMR setup. I have discovered that the database suffix in the two MMR's have two contextCSN values. The code I was using to test was checking the first contextCSN value returned from the "master" server - which is not the "current" CSN against the value generated by the replica. I have not (yet) figured out what that first of the two values is indicating.
--
Frank Swasey | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont | just like everyone else.
"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)