Philip Guenther guenther+ldaptech@sendmail.com schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 09:25
in Nachricht alpine.BSO.2.11.1311130018240.11726@morgaine.local:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 02:24 in
Nachricht <90CA8980100EF12CE4C38252@[192.168.1.93]>:
--On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:03 PM -0600 Alex Moen alexm@ndtel.com wrote:
Any advice on this? What would the proper way to fix it be?
Add a structural objectClass to the entry. All objects are required to have a basic structural objectClass.
Sure? slapadd needs it, but ldapadd refuses to accept a structural objectclass specification in my experience.
The original poster was trying to add this LDIF:
dn: uid=maxUid,ou=ndtcadministration,o=ndtc objectClass: top objectClass: extensibleObject uidNumber: 55083
'top' is an abstract object class, while extensibleObject is an auxiliary object class, so none of that entry's object classes are structural object classes.
Ah! You ment the value, not the tag; I thought you were talking about the tag...
Philip Guenther