Dear Quanah,
Thanks a lot for these 2 pointers. I'll check out the 2.4.30 version. We had used delta syncrepl earlier but our accesslog size used to grow suddenly sometimes and the disk used to get full crashing/hanging the ldap service itself on the provider. But at that time we had kept the max age for the accesslog to be 7 days. I'll reduce it and give it a try again.
Also it would be helpful if you can throw some light on :
2. On a really busy ldap server, can replication slow down drastically? i.e does the read operations affect the replication in any way?
4. We are currently having about 60 consumers - is this too much ? What can be the max numbers of consumers ?
5. Sometimes we urgently need some particular node to be present on the consumer - for which we cannot wait - in that case we get ldif of that node from provider and do ldapadd on the consumer ( mirrormode is ON on the consumers ). Is this safe and correct or could it cause some side effects ? Is there a better way to handle it?
Thanks and Regards, Amol Kulkarni. ----- Original Message ----- From: Quanah Gibson-Mount Sent: 03/09/12 11:57 PM To: Amol Kulkarni, openldap-technical@openldap.org Subject: Re: slow or inconsistent syncrepl
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 2:20 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni amolkulkarni@gmx.com wrote: > I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl : > - openldap version 2.4.23 This is your #1 issue. > - 1 provider and about 10 consumers in lan and 50 consumers on wan This is your #2 issue. Upgrade to a stable release. Use delta-syncrepl, which uses significantly less bandwidth than syncrepl. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration