7 Dec
2012
7 Dec
'12
1:51 a.m.
Cl?ment OUDOT wrote:
2012/12/7 Victor Sudakov vas@mpeks.tomsk.su:
>> the problem can be that Outlook use SSSVLV controls on attributes >> without ordering rules in OpenLDAP. Unfortunately, the 'name' >> attribute has no ordering rules, so you can't sort results on name >> (this includes, cn, sn, gn attributes, because they inherit from >> name). We do not have this limitation on AD (but it breaks LDAP >> standard).
Mark,
Could you be more specific which LDAP standard it breaks? Is there an explicit prohibition for the 'name' attribute to have ordering rules? In the RFCs somewhere?
Yes, but why do you think it is a restrictive definition and no more optional properties can be *added* (without removing the mandatory ones, of course)?
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru