Is it really bad? Is it buggy? Since redhat has its own ldap 389 dir.
server, I suppose they don't care of openldap. isn't it?
Michele Masè
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>wrote:
> --On Sunday, May 20, 2012 2:13 PM +0200 Michele Mase' <
> michele.mase(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Tx for the suggestion! We plan to migrate where possible to rhel6, that
>> has included the 2.4.x openldap (and the possibility of hot adding ram
>> and cpu in VM env). We have already tested a multi-master conf. that
>> works fine.
>>
>
> Using the OpenLDAP included with RHEL6 is a terrible idea. If you want to
> use OpenLDAP as a server, then build it yourself, or use packages from any
> of the numerous other sites that will build it out for you, so that you can
> stay current. Distro packages are in general only for using the client
> libraries.
>
>
> --Quanah
>
> --
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Sr. Member of Technical Staff
> Zimbra, Inc
> A Division of VMware, Inc.
> --------------------
> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
>