openldap-technical

openldap-technical@openldap.org

9897 discussions

LDAP: error code 69 - structural object class modification
by Artur Nike 23 Oct '13

23 Oct '13

Good day, Can anyone know how to update the ldap objects in ver 2.4.31. I have an object: * dn: cn=crit3,ou=criteria,o=n1,dc=nodomain* * objectClass: top* * objectClass: n1criterion* * cn: crit3* * n1asn: 1004* * n1cc: US* * n1fqdn: nask.pl* * n1iprange: 4000,4004* * * *with def: * * attributetype ( 1.5.2.6.6.6.1 * * NAME 'n1asn' * * DESC 'number Autonomous System' * * SUP cn * * )* * * * attributetype ( 1.5.2.6.6.6.2 * * NAME 'n1cc' * * DESC 'country code' * * SUP cn * * )* * * * attributetype ( 1.5.2.6.6.6.3 * * NAME 'n1fqdn' * * DESC 'domain' * * SUP cn * * )* * * * attributetype ( 1.5.2.6.6.6.4 * * NAME 'n1iprange' * * DESC 'ip range' * * SUP cn * * )* * * * objectclass ( 1.5.2.6.6.7.1 * * NAME 'n1criterion' * * DESC 'criterion' * * SUP top * * STRUCTURAL * * MUST cn * * MAY ( n1asn $ n1cc $ n1fqdn $ n1iprange ) * * )* and I want to add another attribute, say n1yyy * attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.111111.99.7 * * NAME 'n1yyy' * * DESC 'vvvv' * * SUP n1cc * * )* * * * objectclass ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.111111.99.8 * * NAME 'n1CNEWcollect' * * DESC 'cvcxvcxvxc' * * SUP n1criterion * * STRUCTURAL * * MAY n1yyy * * )* So creating new atrubut, and class it uses, adding to the schema I want to add to the object dn, a new class, or replace existing it gets the error: * #!RESULT ERROR* * #!CONNECTION ldap://deb:389* * #!DATE 2013-10-23T10:14:34.751* * #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 69 - structural object class modification from 'n1criterion' to 'n1CNEWcollect' not allowed]* * dn: cn=crit3,ou=criteria,o=n1,dc=nodomain* * changetype: modify* * add: objectClass* * objectClass: n1CNEWcollect* * -* * * * #!RESULT ERROR* * #!CONNECTION ldap://deb:389* * #!DATE 2013-10-23T10:17:33.763* * #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 69 - structural object class modification from 'n1criterion' to 'n1CNEWcollect' not allowed]* * dn: cn=crit3,ou=criteria,o=n1,dc=nodomain* * changetype: modify* * add: n1yyy* * n1yyy: SS* * -* * add: objectClass* * objectClass: n1CNEWcollect* * -* * * * #!RESULT ERROR* * #!CONNECTION ldap://deb:389* * #!DATE 2013-10-23T10:18:15.412* * #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 69 - structural object class modification from 'n1criterion' to 'n1CNEWcollect' not allowed]* * dn: cn=crit3,ou=criteria,o=n1,dc=nodomain* * changetype: modify* * add: cn* * cn: dddd* * -* * add: objectClass* * objectClass: n1CNEWcollect* The only thing that works is: -export facility to ldif -swapping of a new class (which inherits old) -Remove the item from the tree, -add the ldif (with swapped class) Maybe I do not understand something, ask for help, how to expand objects Mariusz

2 1

OpenLDAP 2.3.4 TLS negotiation failure
by Tian Zhiying 23 Oct '13

23 Oct '13

Hi On the LDAP Server , I run following command is ok: #ldapsearch -x -H ldap://ldap.server.com -ZZ #ldapsearch -x -H ldap://ldap.server.com But on my client , I run "#ldapsearch -x -H ldap://ldap.server.com", is ok; Run "#ldapsearch -x -H ldap://ldap.server.com -ZZ" , I get the following error: [root@client cacerts]# ldapsearch -x -H ldap://ldap.server.com -ZZ ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11) On LDAP Server log file, I get the following error messages: Oct 23 16:41:25 auth slapd[4213]: conn=206 fd=24 ACCEPT from IP=192.168.9.9:45648 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) Oct 23 16:41:25 auth slapd[4213]: conn=206 op=0 STARTTLS Oct 23 16:41:25 auth slapd[4213]: conn=206 op=0 RESULT oid= err=0 text= Oct 23 16:41:25 auth slapd[4213]: conn=206 fd=24 closed (TLS negotiation failure) My client ldap configuration: /etc/openldap/ldap.conf file: URI ldap://ldap.server.com/ BASE dc=server,dc=com TLS_CACERT /etc/openldap/cacerts/ca.crt SSL ON TLS_REQCERT demand /etc/ldap.conf file: BASE dc=server,dc=com URI ldap://ldap.server.com SSL ON TLS_CACERT /etc/openldap/cacert/ca.crt TLS_REQCERT demand Any suggestion what cause TLS negotiation failure? Thanks! Tian Zhiying

1 0

Pass-through authentication to Active Directory when using saslbind
by Jesus Jr M Salvo 22 Oct '13

22 Oct '13

Hi All, First off, I am a beginner with OpenLDAP, so please bear with me as I try to explain what I am trying to achieve. 1) There are 2 Active Directory servers that I need to connect to. Both of these are NOT under my control. We shall call them AD1 and AD2 here. 2) I can connect to AD1 via testsaslauthd using both simple bind and saslbind using DIGEST-MD5. 2a) For simple bind, I know of an adminstrative read-only account that I use to perform the initial LDAP bind request in order to allow an LDAP searchRequest to authenticate any user with AD1. Below is a sample /etc/saslauthd.conf ( ldap_bind_dn and ldap_bind_pw altered slightly to protect the identity ) ################################################################### #/etc/saslauthd.conf ldap_servers: ldap://172.21.128.49:3268 ldap_default_domain: ad1.priv ldap_search_base: DC=ad1,DC=priv ldap_bind_dn: CN=administrativero,OU=Service_Accounts,DC=ad1,DC=priv ldap_bind_pw: readonly ldap_deref: never ldap_restart: yes ldap_scope: sub ldap_use_sasl: no ldap_start_tls: no ldap_version: 3 ldap_auth_method: bind ldap_filter: sAMAccountName=%u ldap_password_attr: userPassword ldap_timeout: 10 ldap_cache_ttl: 30 ldap_cache_mem: 32768 ######################################################################### $ testsaslauthd -u salvojo -p mypassword 0: OK "Success." ... and what was captured by tshark ( I included port 53 for DNS queries as it was essential for finding out why digest-uri was only IP addresses instead of the hostname later on ): $ sudo tshark -i any port 3268 or port 53 or port 389 <...time elapsed .. snipped..> 81336.300597 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 76 44477 > msft-gc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14600 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50014473 TSecr=0 WS=128 81336.301498 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 TCP 80 msft-gc > 44477 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=64512 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 81336.301626 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44477 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50014474 TSecr=0 81336.301840 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 141 bindRequest(1) "CN=administrativero,OU=Service_Accounts,DC=ad1,DC=priv" simple 81336.304464 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 90 bindResponse(1) success 81336.304559 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44477 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=74 Ack=23 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50014474 TSecr=5446546 81336.304930 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 139 searchRequest(2) "DC=ad1,DC=priv" wholeSubtree 81336.305702 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 175 searchResEntry(2) "CN=John Salvo,OU=Users,OU=_Windows7 Pilot Group,DC=ad1,DC=priv" | searchResDone(2) success 81336.305972 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 154 bindRequest(3) "CN=John Salvo,OU=Users,OU=_Windows7 Pilot Group,DC=ad1,DC=priv" simple 81336.308982 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 90 bindResponse(3) success 81336.349661 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44477 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=231 Ack=152 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50014486 TSecr=5446547 2b) For saslbind using DIGEST-MD5, I have no need for the administrative read-only account, as shown below by my /etc/saslauthd.conf: ( saslauthd was restarted in each case when saslauthd.conf was changed ) ################################################################### #/etc/saslauthd.conf ldap_servers: ldap://172.21.128.49:3268 ldap_deref: never ldap_restart: yes ldap_scope: sub ldap_use_sasl: yes ldap_mech: DIGEST-MD5 ldap_start_tls: no ldap_version: 3 ldap_timeout: 10 ldap_cache_ttl: 30 ldap_cache_mem: 32768 ######################################################################### $ testsaslauthd -u salvojo -p mypassword 0: OK "Success." $ sudo tshark -i any port 3268 or port 53 or port 389 <...time elapsed .. snipped..> 7.488292 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 76 44478 > msft-gc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14600 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50082984 TSecr=0 WS=128 7.489163 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 TCP 80 msft-gc > 44478 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=64512 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 7.489258 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50082985 TSecr=0 7.489757 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.10.24 DNS 88 Standard query PTR 49.128.21.172.in-addr.arpa 7.490577 172.21.10.24 -> 172.21.17.193 DNS 120 Standard query response PTR aassydc01.ad1.priv 7.492610 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 94 bindRequest(1) "<ROOT>" sasl 7.493828 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 326 bindResponse(1) saslBindInProgress 7.493928 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=27 Ack=259 Win=15744 Len=0 TSval=50082986 TSecr=5449287 7.494828 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 442 bindRequest(2) "<ROOT>" sasl 7.498503 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 132 bindResponse(2) success 7.536572 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=401 Ack=323 Win=15744 Len=0 TSval=50082997 TSecr=5449287 All good so far with simple bind and saslauthd to AD1. 3) I can only connect to AD2, the second active directory server, via testsaslauthd using only sasl bind. That is because I do not know of an adminstrative read-only account in AD2 that I can use to perform the initial LDAP bindRequest in order to allow an LDAP searchRequest. Here is the /etc/saslauthd.conf for saslbind to AD2: ################################################################### #/etc/saslauthd.conf # Your AD server adress # NOTE: This will only work IFF there is also a reverse DNS entry for this A record # Otherwise, the digest-uri in the LDAP SASL bind request will only contain the IP address instead of the hostname # which will result in "The digest-uri does not match any LDAP SPN's registered for this server" ldap_servers: ldap://ad2idcdc11.au.ad2.corp:3268 ldap_deref: never ldap_restart: yes ldap_scope: sub ldap_start_tls: no ldap_version: 3 ldap_use_sasl: yes ldap_mech: DIGEST-MD5 ldap_timeout: 10 ldap_cache_ttl: 30 ldap_cache_mem: 32768 #EOF ######################################################################### $ testsaslauthd -u anotheruser -p otherpassword 0: OK "Success." $ sudo tshark -i any port 3268 or port 53 or port 389 <...time elapsed .. snipped..> 321.883648 172.21.17.193 -> 10.3.90.55 TCP 76 49226 > msft-gc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14600 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50161583 TSecr=0 WS=128 321.884343 10.3.90.55 -> 172.21.17.193 TCP 80 msft-gc > 49226 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=16384 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 321.884541 172.21.17.193 -> 10.3.90.55 TCP 68 49226 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50161583 TSecr=0 321.886323 172.21.17.193 -> 10.3.90.55 LDAP 94 bindRequest(1) "<ROOT>" sasl 321.887247 10.3.90.55 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 329 bindResponse(1) saslBindInProgress 321.887336 172.21.17.193 -> 10.3.90.55 TCP 68 49226 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=27 Ack=262 Win=15744 Len=0 TSval=50161584 TSecr=65953794 321.888296 172.21.17.193 -> 10.3.90.55 LDAP 447 bindRequest(2) "<ROOT>" sasl 321.892567 10.3.90.55 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 132 bindResponse(2) success 321.933533 172.21.17.193 -> 10.3.90.55 TCP 68 49226 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=406 Ack=326 Win=15744 Len=0 TSval=50161596 TSecr=65953794 4) I am using SASL because I currently have Subversion 1.8 configured to use SASL to authenticate users to AD1, but currently using simple bind. I will be changing this later on so that saslauthd will use sasl bind to AD1. $ cat /etc/sasl2/svn.conf pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: PLAIN ----------------------------------------------------- Now here is what I am trying to achieve with OpenLDAP: I am using slapd.conf. I am also using the meta backend, as my instance of OpenLDAP will not really have its own LDAP database as I intended to use OpenLDAP for pass-through authentication. 5) I am able to use OpenLDAP as a proxy to AD1 for pass-through authentication via the meta backend, but only if OpenLDAP is configured to use simplebind to AD1. That is: testsaslauthd ( simple bind ) -> OpenLDAP ( simple bind ) -> AD1. Here is my /etc/ldap/slapd.conf: ######################################################################### include /etc/ldap/schema/core.schema include /etc/ldap/schema/cosine.schema include /etc/ldap/schema/nis.schema include /etc/ldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema pidfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid argsfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.args loglevel stats modulepath /usr/lib/ldap moduleload back_meta.so moduleload back_ldap.so sizelimit 500 tool-threads 1 backend meta database meta access to * by * read suffix "dc=ad1,dc=priv" uri ldap://172.21.128.49:3268/dc=ad1,dc=priv chase-referrals no lastmod off protocol-version 3 ######################################################################### .. and here is my /etc/saslauthd.conf for this specific test: ( The only difference between this and [2a] is the ldap_servers entry, which now points to OpenLDAP, and the ldap_filter, which now has an OR condition ) ################################################################### #/etc/saslauthd.conf # # Your AD server adress ldap_servers: ldap://127.0.0.1:389 ldap_default_domain: ad1.priv ldap_search_base: DC=ad1,DC=priv ldap_bind_dn: CN=administrativero,OU=Service_Accounts,DC=ad1,DC=priv ldap_bind_pw: readonly ldap_deref: never ldap_restart: yes ldap_scope: sub ldap_use_sasl: no ldap_start_tls: no ldap_version: 3 ldap_auth_method: bind ldap_filter: (|(uid=%U)(sAMAccountName=%U)) ldap_password_attr: userPassword ldap_timeout: 10 ldap_cache_ttl: 30 ldap_cache_mem: 32768 #EOF ######################################################################### $ testsaslauthd -u salvojo -p mypassword 0: OK "Success." $ sudo tshark -i any port 3268 or port 53 or port 389 <...time elapsed .. snipped..> 1310.330189 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 76 50279 > ldap [SYN] Seq=0 Win=32792 Len=0 MSS=16396 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50408695 TSecr=0 WS=128 1310.330234 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 76 ldap > 50279 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=32768 Len=0 MSS=16396 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50408695 TSecr=50408695 WS=128 1310.330262 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 50279 > ldap [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=32896 Len=0 TSval=50408695 TSecr=50408695 1310.330612 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 141 bindRequest(1) "CN=administrativero,OU=Service_Accounts,DC=ad1,DC=priv" simple 1310.330640 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 ldap > 50279 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=74 Win=32768 Len=0 TSval=50408695 TSecr=50408695 1310.331106 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 76 44485 > msft-gc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14600 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50408695 TSecr=0 WS=128 1310.332041 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 TCP 80 msft-gc > 44485 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=64512 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 1310.332129 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44485 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50408695 TSecr=0 1310.332239 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 141 bindRequest(1) "cn=administrativero,ou=Service_Accounts,dc=ad1,dc=priv" simple 1310.335445 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 90 bindResponse(1) success 1310.335575 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44485 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=74 Ack=23 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50408696 TSecr=5462316 1310.336554 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 82 bindResponse(1) success 1310.336634 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 50279 > ldap [ACK] Seq=74 Ack=15 Win=32896 Len=0 TSval=50408697 TSecr=50408697 1310.336863 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 157 searchRequest(2) "DC=ad1,DC=priv" wholeSubtree 1310.337809 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 157 searchRequest(2) "dc=ad1,dc=priv" wholeSubtree 1310.339277 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 175 searchResEntry(2) "CN=John Salvo,OU=Users,OU=_Windows7 Pilot Group,DC=ad1,DC=priv" | searchResDone(2) success 1310.339581 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 141 searchResEntry(2) "cn=John Salvo,ou=Users,ou=_Windows7 Pilot Group,dc=ad1,dc=priv" 1310.339871 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 82 searchResDone(2) success 1310.339966 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 50279 > ldap [ACK] Seq=163 Ack=102 Win=32896 Len=0 TSval=50408697 TSecr=50408697 1310.340053 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 154 bindRequest(3) "cn=John Salvo,ou=Users,ou=_Windows7 Pilot Group,dc=ad1,dc=priv" simple 1310.340698 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 76 44486 > msft-gc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14600 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50408698 TSecr=0 WS=128 1310.341883 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 TCP 80 msft-gc > 44486 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=64512 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 1310.341977 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44486 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50408698 TSecr=0 1310.342157 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 154 bindRequest(1) "cn=John Salvo,ou=Users,ou=_Windows7 Pilot Group,dc=ad1,dc=priv" simple 1310.345643 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 90 bindResponse(1) success 1310.345733 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44486 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=87 Ack=23 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50408699 TSecr=5462316 1310.346198 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 82 bindResponse(3) success 1310.377558 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44485 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=163 Ack=130 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50408707 TSecr=5462316 1310.384549 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 50279 > ldap [ACK] Seq=249 Ack=116 Win=32896 Len=0 TSval=50408709 TSecr=50408699 You can see from the above that: * The initial administrative simple bind to OpenLDAP was delegated by OpenLDAP to AD1. * The searchRequest to OpenLDAp was delegated by OpenLDAP to AD1. * The second bindRequest ( that is authenticating the user that I specified with testsaslauthd ) to OpenLDAP was delegated by OpenLDAP to AD1. That is, on all 3 cases above, OpenLDAP only returned success back to testsaslauthd only if AD1 only returned success. So far so good. 6) I am unable to use ... or rather confused on how to use .. OpenLDAP as a proxy to AD1 so that OpenLDAP will use sasl bind to AD1. This is where I am stuck. Here is my /etc/saslauthd.conf for this test: The only difference between this and saslauthd.conf in [2b] is the ldap_servers entry, which is now pointing to OpenLDAP. ################################################################### #/etc/saslauthd.conf # # Your AD server adress ldap_servers: ldap://127.0.0.1:389 ldap_deref: never ldap_restart: yes ldap_scope: sub ldap_use_sasl: yes ldap_mech: DIGEST-MD5 ldap_start_tls: no ldap_version: 3 ldap_timeout: 10 ldap_cache_ttl: 30 ldap_cache_mem: 32768 #EOF ######################################################################### Here is my /etc/ldap/slapd.conf for this test: ( The only difference between this file and the slapd.conf file in [5] is the addition of the idassert-bind line ) ######################################################################### include /etc/ldap/schema/core.schema include /etc/ldap/schema/cosine.schema include /etc/ldap/schema/nis.schema include /etc/ldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema pidfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid argsfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.args loglevel stats modulepath /usr/lib/ldap moduleload back_meta.so moduleload back_ldap.so sizelimit 500 tool-threads 1 backend meta database meta access to * by * read suffix "dc=ad1,dc=priv" uri ldap://172.21.128.49:3268/dc=ad1,dc=priv chase-referrals no lastmod off protocol-version 3 idassert-bind bindmethod=sasl saslmech=DIGEST-MD5 mode=none ######################################################################### $ testsaslauthd -u salvojo -p mypassword 0: NO "authentication failed" $ sudo tshark -i any port 3268 or port 53 or port 389 <...time elapsed .. snipped..> 401.111261 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 76 50299 > ldap [SYN] Seq=0 Win=32792 Len=0 MSS=16396 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=51388330 TSecr=0 WS=128 401.111304 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 76 ldap > 50299 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=32768 Len=0 MSS=16396 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=51388330 TSecr=51388330 WS=128 401.111332 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 50299 > ldap [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=32896 Len=0 TSval=51388330 TSecr=51388330 401.113332 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 94 bindRequest(1) "<ROOT>" sasl 401.113419 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 ldap > 50299 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=27 Win=32768 Len=0 TSval=51388330 TSecr=51388330 401.113806 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 304 bindResponse(1) saslBindInProgress (SASL(0): successful result: ) 401.114023 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 50299 > ldap [ACK] Seq=27 Ack=237 Win=32768 Len=0 TSval=51388331 TSecr=51388330 401.114362 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 393 bindRequest(2) "<ROOT>" sasl 401.114671 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 130 bindResponse(2) invalidCredentials (SASL(-13): user not found: no secret in database) 401.153939 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 50299 > ldap [ACK] Seq=352 Ack=299 Win=32768 Len=0 TSval=51388341 TSecr=51388331 As you can see from the above tshark, OpenLDAP did not even try to communicate at all to AD1 ! What should I have in slapd.conf ? Maybe the problem is that, I am using testsaslauthd, which uses saslauthd to connect to OpenLDAP, but also need OpenLDAP to use saslauthd to AD1 ( e.g. It is using the same saslauthd daemon ) ? I also read about at ( Section 14.5 ): http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/security.html ... about setting the userPassword attribute to something of the form: userPassword: {SASL}user@realm ... but: *) I am using a meta backend, and thus I have no internal users, so I cannot set the userPassword attribute .... or is this saying that I need a "copy" of the DN name of the users from AD1 to my local OpenLDAP ? It also says: "Since OpenLDAP 2.0 slapd has had the ability to delegate password verification to a separate **PROCESS** ( emphasis mine ). This uses the sasl_checkpass(3) function so it can use any back-end server that Cyrus SASL supports for checking passwords." .. but: *) How was OpenLDAP able to delegate password verification in the simple-bind proxy as I have demonstrated above WITHOUT going through a separate proccess but going straight through a TCP/IP connection ? *) Is the statement saying that OpenLDAP will use saslauthd to connect to a remote LDAP/AD ? If so, since I am using testsaslauthd and I am already using saslauthd to connect to OpenLDAP, and saslauthd.conf is configured to point to the local OpenLDAP, does this mean I need another instance of saslauthd with its own unix socket and its own saslauthd.conf ? If so, what's the point of having the uri in slapd.conf when the separate instance of saslauthd.conf will have its own entry of the remote ldap / AD1 anyway ? Anyway, as you can see .. I am confused on how to do item [6] above. All I really need to happen is ( from a tcp capture / wireshark perspective ), something like ( similar to the simple bind PTA ): 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 76 44478 > msft-gc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14600 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50082984 TSecr=0 WS=128 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 80 msft-gc > 44478 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=64512 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50082985 TSecr=0 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 94 bindRequest(1) "<ROOT>" sasl 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 76 44478 > msft-gc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14600 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=50082984 TSecr=0 WS=128 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 TCP 80 msft-gc > 44478 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=64512 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=14720 Len=0 TSval=50082985 TSecr=0 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 94 bindRequest(1) "<ROOT>" sasl 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 326 bindResponse(1) saslBindInProgress 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=27 Ack=259 Win=15744 Len=0 TSval=50082986 TSecr=5449287 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 326 bindResponse(1) saslBindInProgress 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=27 Ack=259 Win=15744 Len=0 TSval=50082986 TSecr=5449287 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 442 bindRequest(2) "<ROOT>" sasl 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 LDAP 442 bindRequest(2) "<ROOT>" sasl 172.21.128.49 -> 172.21.17.193 LDAP 132 bindResponse(2) success 172.21.17.193 -> 172.21.128.49 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=401 Ack=323 Win=15744 Len=0 TSval=50082997 TSecr=5449287 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 LDAP 132 bindResponse(2) success 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 44478 > msft-gc [ACK] Seq=401 Ack=323 Win=15744 Len=0 TSval=50082997 TSecr=5449287 7) If I can find out how to do item [6] above with help from this list, then I will try to do the same for AD2. 8) The end goal therefore is to use OpenLDAP as a dumb proxy that will authenticate users to either AD1 or AD2. Any help / hints appreciated, Jesus Salvo

3 5

Subject Alternative Name in TLS - does this work?
by lejeczek 21 Oct '13

21 Oct '13

dear all I'm trying to set a seeminglysimple setup having a box with openldap I want it to use TLS on both internal and external hostnames/IPs openldap was set up earlier and was/is working I generate TLS certificate with SAN everything seems working fine but when I ldapsearch on external fqdn/IP (which in the certificate is the subjectAltName) search fails whereas it succeeds on internal fqdn(which is the hostname/ CN in the certificate) error is: additional info: TLS error -8157:Certificate extension not found. is such a scenario even possible? having very same DN being served on more than one name via TLS? best wishes

9 20

prevent mail loops using constraint overlay
by Ole 21 Oct '13

21 Oct '13

Hi, some user always try to build mail loops, creating a mailForwadingAddress attribute with the value of one of their mail attribute. according to the manpage SLAPO-CONSTRAINT(5): [...] constraint_attribute cn,sn,givenName set "(this/givenName + [ ] + this/sn) & this/cn" [...] it requires the values of the attribute cn to be constructed by pairing values of the attributes sn and givenName, separated by a space, [...] I understand the syntax of the constraint overlay in that way, that the expression after the "set" command has to be true. But if I try to use constraint_attribute mail,mailForwardingAddress set "this/mail | this/mailForwardingAddress" it takes no effect. It should require that there can be a attribute mail with value X OR a value mailForwardingAddress with value X. Is it not valid to use the | operator? Regards Ole

1 0

Updated scheme
by Artur Nike 21 Oct '13

21 Oct '13

Hi all , I have a question. How as the most updated schema file (dynamic) and all objects in the ldif file in. in OpenLDAP 2.4.31. Let's say I have a scheme with its own defined attributes and classes and after a while you need to add an attribute and for example, change the class. How to upload an updated scheme under the same name and do not change the names of the updated attributes and classes. Now Loading a revised scheme under a new name and change the object definitions in the ldif. Can anyone have any suggestions or experience with this problem. For all thank you in advance. Mariusz

1 0

ACL with val.regex expression
by Mark Dieterich 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

Hi all, I'm banging my head against a wall trying to get one particular ACL setup. We want our users, with the exception of those that have a restricted shell, to be able to change their own shell values. A typical user looks like: dn: uid=user,ou=people,dc=cs,dc=brown,dc=edu objectClass: top objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: shadowAccount objectClass: krb5Principal objectClass: sambaSamAccount objectClass: ownCloudUser objectClass: mailUser ... loginShell: /bin/bash We'd ideally like to have an ACL in place that looks like: access to dn.subtree="ou=people,dc=cs,dc=brown,dc=edu" attrs=loginShell val.regex="/bin/[^f][^s][^h]" by ssf=128 self write by * read The idea being that a user with a loginShell value of /bin/fsh would NOT be allowed to change their shell value. However, with this rule in place, no user is able to change their shell value. Even if I change the rule to be: access to dn.subtree="ou=people,dc=cs,dc=brown,dc=edu" attrs=loginShell val.exact="/bin/bash" by ssf=128 self write by * read users with loginShell of /bin/bash still can't change their own values. If I drop the val.<type>="<whatever>" restriction, users can change their shell values just fine. This the first time I've ever used and ACL with a val.<type>= restriction, but I've scoured the internet and I can't for the life of me figure out what I'm doing wrong. I'm happy to have someone here give me a dope slap... I'm just tired of the headaches ;) Thanks! Mark

5 14

Need to Create Default Printer Entries
by Michael C. Ibarra 17 Oct '13

17 Oct '13

Greetings; I’ve recently built a new LDAP infrastructure, migrated from NIS. Under NIS, I had a map, “printers”, which I used to query with “ypcat printers.byname|grep username”. I need to setup default printers for several applications, and making them centrally available, and configurable, is a must for me. The issue I am facing is that my users, now listed under people, have no place to add a default printer; although there is an “allowed attribute” for “host”, which right now for me goes unused. What I would like to do is to create a new database in my DIT, call it say defaultPrinters, which contains left side username, right side printer; i.e.: smitha hp001 joner hp002 carsont hp001 Additionally, I would like to be able to add an allowable attribute under People, named defaultPrinters, which points to the database that I am trying to create. Thanks in advance. -mi

3 3

Does MDB backend shrinks on disk files after delete operation?
by Igor Zinovik 17 Oct '13

17 Oct '13

Hello. I would like to understand one thing about mdb backend: Current size of /var/lib/ldap is 15 megabytes (~ 10000 entries). After i added to my database 1839 entries on disk directory size becomes 93 megabytes. But when i delete all 1839 entires mdb does not free disk space, my /var/lib/ldap is still 93 megabytes in size. It does not remove data and just marks it as 'free' meaning that it is reusable for new write operations? I use mdb from openldap 2.4.33

2 3

Berkeley DB backend - exact version check
by Jan Synacek 16 Oct '13

16 Oct '13

Hello, slapd checks the exact version of BDB at runtime and fails if it doesn't equal to the version that it's been linked against. Is there a reason for such precise check? Shouldn't the major and minor version numbers be enough? The code seems to have been there for a while, so I'm sorry if such question has been asked before. I couldn't find any answers. Thank you, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

openldap-technical