Le mer. 15 mai 2019 22:42, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)symas.com> a écrit :
> --On Wednesday, May 15, 2019 10:37 PM +0200 Manuela Mandache
> <manuela.mandache.mm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Le mer. 15 mai 2019 19:52, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)symas.com> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > --On Wednesday, May 15, 2019 8:23 PM +0200 Manuela Mandache
> > <manuela.mandache.mm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Actually, the replication is in refreshAndPersist mode.
> >>
> >> Replication mode is immaterial.
>
> > Thanks a lot for your detailed and comprehensive answers.
>
> Heh, I can't tell in this case if your serious or sarcastic, but I'll note
> this: it's entirely possible (and legal, and there are valid reasons for
> it) to have an accesslog for a database where the environment is not
> replicated at all. So replication mode, etc, is utterly immaterial to
> whether or not an accesslog may exist, what its purge interval is, etc.
> If
> that helps. :)
>
Oh dear, I was totally serious, meaning to thank you for your three answers
in one go. I might have been too formal, to the point of making you doubt -
sorry, English is not my mother tongue and I live in France...
Now that you mention it, I did read somewhere in the web-wide
documentation that the delta-syncrepl is only one of the possible uses for
the accesslog DB.
And thanks again (seriously ;))
Manuela
>
>