how to enable debug message
by Shu, Xinxin
Hi list ,
I want to enable debug message for lmdb, I have noticed MDB_DEBUG Macro, and I define MDB_DEBUG when compiling lmdb, but did not get any debug message, how can I enable debug message ?
7 years, 11 months
mirror entries with rewrite?
by Christian Bösch
Hi,
I want to mirror entries from a subtree to another virtual tree.
I tried with rwm-rewrite which works for rewriting but I want to keep the real entries.
Is therefor rwm-rewrite the wrong approach or is that possible?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
7 years, 12 months
Sorting the NAME Attribute
by Tim Gustafson
In the following post:
http://www.openldap.org/cgi-bin/wilma_hiliter/openldap-technical/201001/m...
Quanah said:
> However, I will note, the definitions of these attributes are RFC
> defined. They have no ORDERING rule on purpose.
I was not able to find what that purpose was. Does anyone have any
idea why it was decided that something as critical as "name"
attributes shouldn't have an ORDERING rule?
In my case, I have users who have a lower-case first-letter in their
last name, which makes them appear at the bottom of all lists of
people when sorted on the LDAP server. Needless to say, this makes
them unhappy.
For most of my purposes, I simply sort the data in my code once it is
retrieved from the LDAP server, but in some cases I don't have control
over the software being used and therefore can't change it, and in
other cases this is terribly inefficient or impractical.
Other than "because the RFC says so", what's the reasoning behind not
defining an ORDERING rule for "name" attributes", preferably one that
is case-insensitive? Could it at least be made a build option to
enable or disable an ORDERING rule on at least that attribute (or
perhaps in a more general configurable way for other attributes as
well), even if it's not truly RFC-compliant?
--
Tim Gustafson
tjg(a)ucsc.edu
831-459-5354
Baskin Engineering, Room 313A
7 years, 12 months
