8:32 p.m.
Hi All,
We are planning to configure High Availability for OpenLDAP 2.1 on Linux CentOS.
We are looking at following options and we want to check our understanding about
corresponding options and looking for your valuable suggestions.
1. Using Replica Service
a. This is not enough because if master machine goes down then LDAP updates will not
be possible.
2. Migrating to OpenLDAP2.4
a. Master-Master solution looks promising but in our current project time line it is
not possible to migrate.
3. Sharing LDAP file system on NFS
a. After going through the thread
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200209/msg00256.html it is understood that
OpenLDAP does not support GFS or NFS.
b. But the thread discussion happened very long back around in 2000 to 2002. ????Is
that conclusion applicable to OpenLDAP 2.1????
4. Hosting LDAP Service on CentOS Cluster Suite
a. ????Is it possible to configure "Active-Passive" setup using CentOS
Cluster Suite????
5. H/W based clustering
a. We don't know what are the possible solutions in this approach and cost
incurred. !!!!Please share your ideas.!!!!
6. NetApp2020
a. We have NetApp 2020 Appliance
http://www.b2net.co.uk/netapp/network_appliance_netapp_fas2020.htm with us. ????Does this
any way help us????
7. Other alternatives
a. !!!!We need your valuable ideas and suggestions.!!!!
Please help me in this regard.
Regards,
Prasad.
________________________________
The information contained in this communication is confidential, intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be legally privileged and
protected by professional secrecy. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the
message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in
error. This email does not constitute any commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its
subsidiaries except when expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended
recipient and Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. Cordys is neither liable for the
proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor
for any delay in its receipt. Cordys does not guarantee that the integrity of this
communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of viruses,
interceptions or interference. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication
please return the communication to the sender and delete and destroy all copies.
2:22 a.m.
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:32:25 Kukkala Prasad wrote:
Hi All,
We are planning to configure High Availability for OpenLDAP 2.1 on Linux
CentOS.
Why 2.1? AFAIK, no version of CentOS shipped 2.1 anyway (RHEL3 had 2.0.27.
RHEL4 had 2.2.13, RHEL5 shipped with 2.3.27, but 5.3 now has a relatively
decent 2.3.43).
We are looking at following options and we want to check our
understanding
about corresponding options and looking for your valuable suggestions.
1. Using Replica Service
a. This is not enough because if master machine goes down then LDAP
updates will not be possible.
You haven't stated all your requirements, but if you require HA for writes,
then this is not a sufficient option.
2. Migrating to OpenLDAP2.4
a. Master-Master solution looks promising but in our current project
time line it is not possible to migrate.
Why not ? OpenLDAP 2.1 is very old, and not supported any more, same for 2.2,
and 2.3 is effectively end of life.
There are packages of 2.4 available for some versions of RHEL or CentOS.
3. Sharing LDAP file system on NFS
a. After going through the thread
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200209/msg00256.html it is
understood that OpenLDAP does not support GFS or NFS.
It could work on GFS, but not concurrently, and GFS requires the same (or
better) infrastructure than a simple HA cluster.
However, I hope this is not the best option you found in researching this.
NFS can't work.
b. But the thread discussion happened very long back around in
2000 to
2002. ????Is that conclusion applicable to OpenLDAP 2.1????
4. Hosting LDAP Service on CentOS Cluster Suite
a. ????Is it possible to configure "Active-Passive" setup using
CentOS Cluster Suite????
Of course. I have been running OpenLDAP masters on Red Hat Cluster Suite since
2004 on Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1 (with OpenLDAP 2.1.25). I currently have
an active-passive master cluster running RHEL3 with cluster suite, with
OpenLDAP 2.3.42 (will be upgraded to 2.3.43 tonight). It has seen a few
minutes of downtime in the past 3 years (about one minute for each OpenLDAP
upgrade as the service must be migrated twice).
You need some kind of shared storage solution for this (preferably FC SAN, but
iSCSI is an option, and DRBD could do the trick).
5. H/W based clustering
a. We don't know what are the possible solutions in this approach and
cost incurred. !!!!Please share your ideas.!!!!
6. NetApp2020
a. We have NetApp 2020 Appliance
http://www.b2net.co.uk/netapp/network_appliance_netapp_fas2020.htm with us.
????Does this any way help us????
7. Other alternatives
a. !!!!We need your valuable ideas and suggestions.!!!!
I would probably go for an HA cluster with cluster suite using iSCSI for
shared storage, running 2.3.43 or 2.4.16.
Multi-master might also be an option, but then you *must* 2.4.16 (with patches
from CVS if you use hdb).
Regards,
Buchan
4:46 a.m.
Kukkala Prasad wrote:
We are planning to configure High Availability for OpenLDAP 2.1 on
Linux
CentOS.
2.1 is a really ancient release.
1. Using Replica Service
a. This is not enough because if master machine goes down then
LDAP updates will not be possible.
You could set up a failover mechanism.
2. Migrating to OpenLDAP2.4
a. Master-Master solution looks promising but in our current
project time line it is not possible to migrate.
I really wonder why you think that the migration is so much effort. Just
go for it.
Ciao, Michael.
4:58 a.m.
Hi Buchan,
Thank you very much for such a detailed response.
We need HA for LDAP writes also.
We are using bdb.
Is it safe to upgraded to OpenLDAP 2.4 without testing compatibility/stability of it with
our product?
Can I use the package available at
ftp://ftp.dti.ad.jp/pub/net/OpenLDAP/openldap-stable/openldap-stable-20090411.tgz? Or do I
need to get specific package for CentOS?
Regards,
Prasad.
-----Original Message-----
From: Buchan Milne [mailto:bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 2:53 PM
To: openldap-technical(a)openldap.org
Cc: Kukkala Prasad
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:32:25 Kukkala Prasad wrote:
Hi All,
We are planning to configure High Availability for OpenLDAP 2.1 on Linux
CentOS.
Why 2.1? AFAIK, no version of CentOS shipped 2.1 anyway (RHEL3 had 2.0.27.
RHEL4 had 2.2.13, RHEL5 shipped with 2.3.27, but 5.3 now has a relatively
decent 2.3.43).
We are looking at following options and we want to check our
understanding
about corresponding options and looking for your valuable suggestions.
1. Using Replica Service
a. This is not enough because if master machine goes down then LDAP
updates will not be possible.
You haven't stated all your requirements, but if you require HA for writes,
then this is not a sufficient option.
2. Migrating to OpenLDAP2.4
a. Master-Master solution looks promising but in our current project
time line it is not possible to migrate.
Why not ? OpenLDAP 2.1 is very old, and not supported any more, same for 2.2,
and 2.3 is effectively end of life.
There are packages of 2.4 available for some versions of RHEL or CentOS.
3. Sharing LDAP file system on NFS
a. After going through the thread
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200209/msg00256.html it is
understood that OpenLDAP does not support GFS or NFS.
It could work on GFS, but not concurrently, and GFS requires the same (or
better) infrastructure than a simple HA cluster.
However, I hope this is not the best option you found in researching this.
NFS can't work.
b. But the thread discussion happened very long back around in
2000 to
2002. ????Is that conclusion applicable to OpenLDAP 2.1????
4. Hosting LDAP Service on CentOS Cluster Suite
a. ????Is it possible to configure "Active-Passive" setup using
CentOS Cluster Suite????
Of course. I have been running OpenLDAP masters on Red Hat Cluster Suite since
2004 on Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1 (with OpenLDAP 2.1.25). I currently have
an active-passive master cluster running RHEL3 with cluster suite, with
OpenLDAP 2.3.42 (will be upgraded to 2.3.43 tonight). It has seen a few
minutes of downtime in the past 3 years (about one minute for each OpenLDAP
upgrade as the service must be migrated twice).
You need some kind of shared storage solution for this (preferably FC SAN, but
iSCSI is an option, and DRBD could do the trick).
5. H/W based clustering
a. We don't know what are the possible solutions in this approach and
cost incurred. !!!!Please share your ideas.!!!!
6. NetApp2020
a. We have NetApp 2020 Appliance
http://www.b2net.co.uk/netapp/network_appliance_netapp_fas2020.htm with us.
????Does this any way help us????
7. Other alternatives
a. !!!!We need your valuable ideas and suggestions.!!!!
I would probably go for an HA cluster with cluster suite using iSCSI for
shared storage, running 2.3.43 or 2.4.16.
Multi-master might also be an option, but then you *must* 2.4.16 (with patches
from CVS if you use hdb).
Regards,
Buchan
The information contained in this communication is confidential, intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be legally privileged and
protected by professional secrecy. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the
message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in
error. This email does not constitute any commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its
subsidiaries except when expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended
recipient and Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. Cordys is neither liable for the
proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor
for any delay in its receipt. Cordys does not guarantee that the integrity of this
communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of viruses,
interceptions or interference. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication
please return the communication to the sender and delete and destroy all copies.
5:08 a.m.
Kukkala Prasad wrote:
Is it safe to upgraded to OpenLDAP 2.4 without testing
compatibility/stability of it with our product?
In general it is never safe to upgrade without testing. Upgrading from
2.1 to 2.4 I wouldn't expect too many interop problems with your LDAP
client app though provided you know what you're doing.
But when using multi-master replication you should be aware of some
issues with data consistency when doing load-balancing/automatic
fail-over between the replicas during several write requests.
Worth reading: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-02
Whether there is any issue with multi-master replication highly depends
on the nature of your data and the behaviour of your application.
Ciao, Michael.
6:52 a.m.
On Thursday 07 May 2009 13:58:09 Kukkala Prasad wrote:
Hi Buchan,
Thank you very much for such a detailed response.
We need HA for LDAP writes also.
We are using bdb.
Is it safe to upgraded to OpenLDAP 2.4 without testing
compatibility/stability of it with our product?
You should always do *some* testing.
Can I use the package available at
ftp://ftp.dti.ad.jp/pub/net/OpenLDAP/openldap-stable/openldap-stable-200904
11.tgz?
You can, but you will need to build at least one other item for a stable
system ...
Or do I need to get specific package for CentOS?
What version of CentOS ?
E.g., I have 2.4.11 for RHEL 5 here, and I am trying to finish 2.4.16 for RHEL5
now (packages should be available within a day or two):
http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5/openldap/
Regards,
Buchan
11:26 p.m.
Hi All,
I have downloaded "openldap-2.4.11-1.4.el4.i386.rpm" and trying to install it on
CentOS 4.7 Linux machine. But it seems OpenLADP2.2.13 is already comes with CentOS. Then I
tried to upgrade but failed with error "Failed dependencies".
What I am supposed to do now?
You can check the list of commands I have used and corresponding results below.
-------------------------------------------
# rpm -ql openldap
/etc/openldap
/etc/openldap/cacerts
/etc/openldap/ldap.conf
/usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7
/usr/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7.0.6
/usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7
/usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.6
/usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7
/usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.6
/usr/share/doc/openldap-2.2.13
/usr/share/doc/openldap-2.2.13/ANNOUNCEMENT
/usr/share/doc/openldap-2.2.13/CHANGES
/usr/share/doc/openldap-2.2.13/COPYRIGHT
/usr/share/doc/openldap-2.2.13/LICENSE
/usr/share/doc/openldap-2.2.13/README
/usr/share/man/man5/ldap.conf.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/ldif.5.gz
/usr/share/openldap
---------------------------------------------
# rpm -Uvh openldap-2.4.11-1.4.el4.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) cyrus-sasl-2.1.19-14.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) libuser-0.52.5-1.el4.3.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) autofs-4.1.3-234.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) nss_ldap-253-5.el4.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) sendmail-8.13.1-3.3.el4.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) apr-util-0.9.4-22.el4.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.centos4.i3
86
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) mod_perl-1.99_16-4.5.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) php-ldap-4.3.9-3.22.9.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) squid-2.5.STABLE14-4.el4.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) samba-common-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i3
86
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) samba-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) samba-client-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i3
86
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) evolution-data-server-1.0.2-14
.el4.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) pwlib-1.6.5-11.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) openh323-1.13.4-7.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) gnomemeeting-1.0.2-9.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) evolution-2.0.2-41.el4.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) python-ldap-2.0.1-2.i386
liblber-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) openldap-clients-2.2.13-12.el4
.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) cyrus-sasl-2.1.19-14.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) libuser-0.52.5-1.el4.3.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) autofs-4.1.3-234.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) gnupg-1.2.6-9.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) nfs-utils-lib-1.0.6-8.z1.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) nss_ldap-253-5.el4.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) sendmail-8.13.1-3.3.el4.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) nfs-utils-1.0.6-87.EL4.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) apr-util-0.9.4-22.el4.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.centos4.i3
86
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) mod_perl-1.99_16-4.5.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) php-ldap-4.3.9-3.22.9.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) squid-2.5.STABLE14-4.el4.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) samba-common-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i3
86
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) samba-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) samba-client-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i3
86
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) evolution-data-server-1.0.2-14
.el4.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) pwlib-1.6.5-11.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) openh323-1.13.4-7.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) gnomemeeting-1.0.2-9.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) evolution-2.0.2-41.el4.i386
libldap-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) openldap-clients-2.2.13-12.el4
.i386
libldap_r-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) pwlib-1.6.5-11.i386
libldap_r-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) openh323-1.13.4-7.i386
libldap_r-2.2.so.7 is needed by (installed) python-ldap-2.0.1-2.i386
openldap = 2.2.13-12.el4 is needed by (installed) openldap-devel-2.2.13-
12.el4.i386
openldap = 2.2.13-12.el4 is needed by (installed) openldap-clients-2.2.1
3-12.el4.i386
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards,
Prasad.
-----Original Message-----
From: Buchan Milne [mailto:bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:23 PM
To: Kukkala Prasad
Cc: openldap-technical(a)openldap.org
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability
On Thursday 07 May 2009 13:58:09 Kukkala Prasad wrote:
Hi Buchan,
Thank you very much for such a detailed response.
We need HA for LDAP writes also.
We are using bdb.
Is it safe to upgraded to OpenLDAP 2.4 without testing
compatibility/stability of it with our product?
You should always do *some* testing.
Can I use the package available at
ftp://ftp.dti.ad.jp/pub/net/OpenLDAP/openldap-stable/openldap-stable-200904
11.tgz?
You can, but you will need to build at least one other item for a stable
system ...
Or do I need to get specific package for CentOS?
What version of CentOS ?
E.g., I have 2.4.11 for RHEL 5 here, and I am trying to finish 2.4.16 for RHEL5
now (packages should be available within a day or two):
http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5/openldap/
Regards,
Buchan
The information contained in this communication is confidential, intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be legally privileged and
protected by professional secrecy. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the
message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in
error. This email does not constitute any commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its
subsidiaries except when expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended
recipient and Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. Cordys is neither liable for the
proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor
for any delay in its receipt. Cordys does not guarantee that the integrity of this
communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of viruses,
interceptions or interference. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication
please return the communication to the sender and delete and destroy all copies.
12:57 a.m.
Kukkala Prasad <kprasad(a)cordys.com> writes:
Hi All,
I have downloaded "openldap-2.4.11-1.4.el4.i386.rpm" and trying to
install it on CentOS 4.7 Linux machine. But it seems OpenLADP2.2.13 is
already comes with CentOS. Then I tried to upgrade but failed with
error "Failed dependencies".
What I am supposed to do now?
Build your own binary or ask the CentOS maintainer.
-Dieter
--
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
http://www.dpunkt.de/buecher/2104.html
sip: +49.180.1555.7770535
GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6
53°08'09,95"N
10°08'02,42"E
1:34 a.m.
New subject: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
Kukkala Prasad wrote:
KP> I have downloaded "openldap-2.4.11-1.4.el4.i386.rpm" and trying to
install
KP> it on CentOS 4.7 Linux machine. But it seems OpenLADP2.2.13 is
KP> already comes with CentOS. Then I tried to upgrade but failed with error
KP> "Failed dependencies".
KP> What I am supposed to do now?
Try our set of 2.4.11 packages for RHEL4/CentOS4:
http://pastebin.siriusit.co.uk/slapd2411rhel4/
(URL not guaranteed to work indefinitely)
The dependencies of stock CentOS stuff on liblber2.2 should be satisfied
by the "compat-..." package.
Cheers
Duncan
--
Duncan Gibb - Technical Director
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk/ || t: +44 870 608 0063
Debian Cyrus Team - https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-cyrus-imapd/
2:02 a.m.
New subject: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
Duncan Gibb wrote:
Kukkala Prasad wrote:
KP> I have downloaded "openldap-2.4.11-1.4.el4.i386.rpm" and trying to
install
KP> it on CentOS 4.7 Linux machine. But it seems OpenLADP2.2.13 is
KP> already comes with CentOS. Then I tried to upgrade but failed with error
KP> "Failed dependencies".
KP> What I am supposed to do now?
Try our set of 2.4.11 packages for RHEL4/CentOS4:
One should use 2.4.16 if multi-master replication is needed.
Ciao, Michael.
2:12 a.m.
New subject: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
Michael Ströder wrote:
DG> Try our set of 2.4.11 packages for RHEL4/CentOS4:
MS> One should use 2.4.16 if multi-master replication is needed.
We have 2.4.16 for Debian/amd64, but not RHEL/i386. One generally
builds packages for which one's customers have immediate need ;-)
Duncan
--
Duncan Gibb - Technical Director
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk/ || t: +44 870 608 0063
Debian Cyrus Team - https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-cyrus-imapd/
3:51 a.m.
New subject: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
Duncan Gibb wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
DG> Try our set of 2.4.11 packages for RHEL4/CentOS4:
MS> One should use 2.4.16 if multi-master replication is needed.
We have 2.4.16 for Debian/amd64, but not RHEL/i386. One generally
builds packages for which one's customers have immediate need ;-)
To stress the term "customers' immediate need" in this particular case:
The original subject was "OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability". IIRC the
original poster wanted to use multi-master replication (MMR). So given
the various MMR-related fixes *after* 2.4.11 it's wrong to point him to
a 2.4.11 build because he might raise issues here which are already solved.
Ciao, Michael.
4:07 a.m.
New subject: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
Michael Ströder wrote:
MS> IIRC the original poster wanted to use multi-master
MS> replication (MMR). So given the various MMR-related
MS> fixes *after* 2.4.11 it's wrong to point him to a
MS> 2.4.11 build because he might raise issues here which
MS> are already solved.
OK. I didn't read the whole thread. I saw someone wanting to install
2.4.11 on RHEL/CentOS, which we have reasonably well-tested packages for.
I entirely agree that new deployments should use not earlier than the
latest stable release, and MMR especially so.
We don't currently have 2.4.16 for RHEL, but someone will.
Cheers
Duncan
--
Duncan Gibb - Technical Director
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk/ || t: +44 870 608 0063
Debian Cyrus Team - https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-cyrus-imapd/
4:21 a.m.
New subject: 2.4.11 for RHEL4/CentOS4 (was Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 High Availability)
Duncan Gibb wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
MS> IIRC the original poster wanted to use multi-master
MS> replication (MMR). So given the various MMR-related
MS> fixes *after* 2.4.11 it's wrong to point him to a
MS> 2.4.11 build because he might raise issues here which
MS> are already solved.
OK. I didn't read the whole thread. I saw someone wanting to install
2.4.11 on RHEL/CentOS, which we have reasonably well-tested packages for.
I entirely agree that new deployments should use not earlier than the
latest stable release, and MMR especially so.
We don't currently have 2.4.16 for RHEL, but someone will.
Indeed.
http://www.symas.com/updates/
http://www.symas.com/updates/?p=32
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
5061
days inactive
5069
days old
openldap-technical@openldap.org
13 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Buchan Milne -
Dieter Kluenter -
Duncan Gibb -
Howard Chu -
Kukkala Prasad -
Michael Ströder