Rodrigo Costa wrote:
I was preparing openLDAP with GDB symbols but looks like the issue was
and solved in HEAD. Just to identify this issue; was created any
sort of ITS for verification in a new load?
No, the further work was just associated with ITS#5860.
Sorry my late response but my baby daughter just born last week and I
having some work at home.
I will give a try in the HEAD load.
Try RE24 now, that's the current release candidate.
PS-> Just some link from my daughter
--- On Wed, 3/18/09, Howard Chu<hyc(a)symas.com> wrote:
> From: Howard Chu<hyc(a)symas.com>
> Subject: Re: slapd syncrepl consumer having permanent high CPU load
> To: "John Morrissey"<jwm(a)horde.net>
> Cc: openldap-software(a)openldap.org
> Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2009, 5:21 AM
> John Morrissey wrote:
>> After ~16h uptime, slapd with this BDB had increased
> its DN cache to ~250k
>> entries after it previously appeared stable at the
> configured 20k entries,
>> and its entry cache had ballooned to ~480k entries.
> Its RSS was about 3.6GB
>> at this point, with a BDB cache size of 2GB.
> I was finally able to reproduce this (took several hours of
> searches. Fortunately I was at a St. Pat's party so I didn't
> have to wait around, just got home in time to see it start
> going bad...). A fix is now in HEAD.
> (And now we'll see if Guinness is Good For Your Code... ;)
> -- -- Howard Chu
> CTO, Symas Corp.
> Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
> Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/