7 Mar
2009
7 Mar
'09
9:47 a.m.
John Morrissey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:40:55PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
John Morrissey wrote:
A backtrace (below) shows many threads waiting on a mutex in bdb_cache_*().
From the trace it looks similar to ITS#5860. The patches for this are in HEAD, not yet released.
With an shm_key, slapd CPU consumption dropped noticably and has been running long enough to make the leak apparent.
Since this second-round fix for ITS#5860 has been merged into RE24, do you recommend running that, or should I cherry-pick 1.120.2.{21,22} into our local packaging?
At this point I would just use RE24. Unless any new critical bugs show up in the next few days, it's very likely what will be 2.4.16.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/