--On Monday, August 30, 2021 11:14 AM +0200 Saša-Stjepan Bakša <ssbaksa(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > I have similar situation and also a replicated environment. I am using > posixGroup only and never had any need for a memberOf attribute. > But now, my devs have a software which insists on that attribute so I > should provide it for them. posixGroup is not a valid objectClass to use with providing memberOf information. --Quanah Ouch! I have 51 different posixGroup groups which have been in use for more than 10 years and now because of one piece of software I must change the way I manage them all. Not happy at all. What is your suggestion Quanah? Can I just add an object? It would be a problem if I must change all services. Or maybe just add a few new groups of different types for that software. That will be great if it is appropriate. @Dave Macias Can you share the structure of your groups?