--On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:06 AM +0200 Jehan Procaccia jehan.procaccia@tem-tsp.eu wrote:
Le 21/05/2012 18:33, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Monday, May 21, 2012 3:15 PM +0200 jehan procaccia jehan.procaccia@it-sudparis.eu wrote:
ok __dd.xxx files are memory mapped files, then which is the file(s) that contains the database ? I suspect id2entry.bdb, but why on the master the size in KB is: 195412 id2entry.bdb and on the slave 32 id2entry.bdb
It doesn't look to me like your replica is replicating at all. Have you done a slapcat of the two and verified they are identical?
--Quanah
Ok, then I did a slapcat on a replica and to my big surprise, before I did the slapcat, bdb files on the replica were very small, then as soon as I did the slapcat (while slapd is off), now they are similar in size to the master !? Do we need to run regularly slapcat on replicas in order to "really" replicate ?
No. It sounds like you don't have a checkpoint directive set for your database. You should fix that.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration