On 3/10/09 12:20 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:49 AM -0400 Francis Swasey
> To be specific, there are changes that make it into the master
> and the auditlog overlay logs them, but the accesslog overlay does NOT
> put them in the accesslog database, so they do not get sent to the
> replica servers.
> It seems to be some kind of race condition. I haven't figured out a way
> to reproduce the failure yet.
Oh, you have auditlog in place too? I don't believe you mentioned that
before. I bet it is related to them both being enabled.
It is the first time I've mentioned it in this thread, but I've
mentioned it in previous threads.
So -- why would having auditlog and accesslog (and syncprov) all used
with a database cause accesslog to miss some of the changes?
Frank Swasey | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont | just like everyone else.
"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)