Re: Supported RFC's and "features"
Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> writes:
I suppose we need to update our published roadmap. I don't
consider SSS
or VLV to be particularly important or well-designed features. In fact
OpenLDAP has an RFC-compliant implementation of SSS which is a pure
no-op; this is perfectly compliant because the SSS spec is so utterly
useless in real directories. Since VLV requires SSS, it is IMO equally
useless or at least seriously flawed, and I have a strong aversion to
implementing flawed designs. (Never mind all the other flawed designs
we're forced to live with already...)
It might be worth noting that, depending on your application and the
provenance of the data, the valsort overlay may actually be what you want
rather than server-side sorting.
--
Russ Allbery (rra(a)stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>