Re: slapd crashing "randomly?"

On 2/6/07, daniel(a)ncsu.edu <daniel(a)ncsu.edu&gt; wrote: > Hi folk, > > I want to start this message by saying, what I'm about to describe is > completely vague and I don't expect to get a solution response. ;) > Basically, I'm out of ideas and am looking for some suggestions as > to how > to debug the issue I'm running into. > > Starting about half a year ago, slapd started "just dieing" out of > the > blue. Not a think in the logs shows up to indicate what might > have caused > it. The last query that I see in the logs before a crash always > seems to > be nothing special. I don't even see a core dump being generated > yet, but > then that may just be because I don't have the proper setup to get > a core > dump at this time. We were running the last 2.2 and upgraded to the > latest release of 2.3 to make sure it wasn't an "old version" issue. > Unfortunately, slapd still dies a fair amount on us. It appears > to be > fairly unpredictable. I've seen it crash within 1 minute of > starting up > slapd (then a subsequent startup 'takes' just fine). I've seen it > crash > when there were a number of network issues going on. I've seen it > crash > out of the blue when nothing appeared to be going on. I don't > really have > the drive space to turn on max debug logging 24/7 until the problem > occurs. > > We're thinking about setting up something to watch all of the network > traffic going to one of the boxes until it dies. (assuming we can > find > something with the resources to do that) > > That all said... since I have nothing solid to present, do you > all have > any suggestions of what would be the best way to track down what's > going > on? I'm literally out of ideas unless my berkeley db config is > somehow > causing the problem or something like that. > > I apologize for the vagueness. =/ Any ideas/suggestions? > After the crash, is your bdb environment clean, or is it needing a db_recover? Depending on your OS, you could watch the pid all the time and trap the last signals received, last files accessed, etc, and that wouldn't take tons of resources.

You could try turning on max debugging and simply rotate a lot more often. (every n minutes or even seconds) This way you could definitely keep the -last- transactions and just not worry about the old ones.