Im using the ldbm backend as was suggested for debian (I can't recall
from where I got this). I think it internally uses bdb 4.3
I would rather stay with the version packaged with my distribution if
there is no known issue with it.
I have no control over the master-server, but as far as i know it also
uses an openldap 2.2.x.
Quanah Gibson-Mount schrieb:
--On Friday, October 27, 2006 10:48 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<quanah(a)stanford.edu> wrote:
>
>
> --On Friday, October 27, 2006 7:17 PM +0200 David Pruem
> <pruem(a)hdm-stuttgart.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running an openldap 2.2.23 replica on a debian 3.1 (sarge) system.
>> Once in a while the index gets damaged and I have to use slapreindex to
>> get authentication working again.
>>
>> The master server is running on fedora core (I don't know the version).
>>
>> Is there anything I can do about this problem?
>
> Well, I've never seen that behavior, and your report is kind of vague on
> the details. But I'd certainly recommend using a current version of
> OpenLDAP (2.3.28 is the current release). Or at least use 2.2.30, which
> was the final 2.2 release.
>
> What version of BDB is your replica using? 4.2? 4.3?
Howard reminded me to ask... What database backend are you using? LDBM?
BDB?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key:
http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
--
Hochschule der Medien
Studiengang Informationsdesign
Wolframstrasse 32
D-70191 Stuttgart
++49 (0)711 25706 114