Sorry, it is an F5 cluster, two 6400's in active<->active mode. We also tried active-passive mode, with no change in the issue. -- David J. Andruczyk ________________________________ From: Tom Ryan <tomryan(a)camlaw.rutgers.edu&gt; To: djandruczyk(a)yahoo.com; jmadden(a)ivytech.edu Cc: openldap-software(a)openldap.org Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 6:54:32 AM Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32 Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32 I notice that you are talking about only one F5? How do you have your secondary F5 configured?? Perhaps the issue is in that? Granted, I realize this doesn't contribute to the conversation, but it does raise a point. Just saying... ----- Original Message ----- From: openldap-software-bounces+tomryan=camlaw.rutgers.edu(a)openldap.org <openldap-software-bounces+tomryan=camlaw.rutgers.edu(a)openldap.org&gt; To: John Madden <jmadden(a)ivytech.edu&gt; Cc: openldap-software(a)openldap.org <openldap-software(a)openldap.org&gt; Sent: Tue Jul 21 22:03:52 2009 Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32 yep, for a production environment, running on only one, is a sure fire way to earn myself a sparkling new pink slip... -- David J. Andruczyk ----- Original Message ---- From: John Madden <jmadden(a)ivytech.edu&gt; To: David J. Andruczyk <djandruczyk(a)yahoo.com&gt; Cc: openldap-software(a)openldap.org Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:47:07 PM Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32 On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:39 -0700, David J. Andruczyk wrote: Given, I run a smaller environment, but even on a several-years-old v2.2.x install I regularly see several thousand requests per second -- not minute -- with tons of logging enabled -- handled while hardly touching the CPU. Are you sure you really need multiple machines? John -- John Madden Sr UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana jmadden(a)ivytech.edu