Hi,
I'm currently using an old LDAP infrastructure, mostly using openldap 2.2.3 from Debian Sarge, with slurp-based replication. I'm willing to switch to something newer, using openldap 2.3.30 from Debian Etch, with syncrepl-based replication.
Since I won't be able to update all the replicas in one shot, I will have to keep some slurp replicas around.
So I thought I would use a master server with openldap 2.3.30 which serves as a syncrepl provider, a few (new) syncrepl replicas, a "relay" that acts both as a syncrepl replica and as a slurpd master, and my old slurp replicas.
The "relay" is configured like this:
(...) replogfile /var/lib/ldap/slapd.replog (...) backend bdb (...) database bdb suffix "dc=example,dc=com" rootdn "cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com" (...) replica host=slurp-replica.example.com:389 tls=yes suffix="dc=example,dc=com" binddn="cn=replica,dc=example,dc=com" credentials=XXXXXXXX bindmethod=simple (...) syncrepl rid=124 provider=ldap://master.example.com type=refreshAndPersist interval=00:01:00:00 searchbase="dc=example,dc=com" sizelimit=unlimited bindmethod=simple binddn="cn=syncrepl,dc=example,dc=com" credentials=XXXXXXXX starttls=critical
Changes to the master server are correctly replicated to the relay, but no /var/lib/ldap/slapd.replog is generated, so slurpd does nothing. If I remove the syncrepl section and add a rootpw, then changes done locally lead to a /var/lib/ldap/slapd.replog file, as expected.
Is it possible for a LDAP server to serve both as a syncrepl replica and a slurpd server?
Cheers,
Nicolas Boullis