--On Monday, March 23, 2009 2:04 PM -0400 John Morrissey <jwm(a)horde.net>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:32:53PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:30 PM -0500 John Morrissey
> <jwm(a)horde.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:13:49PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > > Interseting. I've seen this sort of CPU usage issue with OpenLDAP
> > > 2.3/BDB4.2.52 on Ubuntu 8. Do you know how BDB 4.7 was built? I.e.,
> > > specifically, did it have the:
> > >
> > > --enable-posixmutexes --with-mutex=POSIX/pthreads
> > >
> > > options enabled?
> > It's the Debian packaging for BDB 4.7 (only available in sid, but it's
> > a simple rebuild to backport to lenny). They do *not* appear to pass
> > any mutex-related options to ./configure.
> Yeah, that's a major problem in using Debian's builds of BDB. You want
> those options sent to configure when using BDB on Linux NPTL systems.
FWIW, I've filed http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520926
against the Debian BDB 4.7 packaging.
Thanks. I've send in a comment that they can review the discussion about
this in <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=421946>
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration