Re: WARNING: No dynamic config support for database ldbm

matthew sporleder wrote:

On 2/23/07, Asrai khn asraikhn@gmail.com wrote:

...

So what you suggest, do we need to migrate to some other backend db or we can use the existing ldbm and ignoring the warning? (remember this is our primary ldap server for authenticating users for different services eg, company php application, wiki, phpmyadmin etc

Migrate now or migrate later when ldbm is removed. BDB is faster and offers more backup/recovery features than ldbm.

"when ldbm is removed" - that's a done deal, the code was removed from CVS HEAD April 8 2006. We *can* still make patches to the 2.3 branch, but the likelihood of that happening from here on out is about zero.