Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Saturday, February 09, 2008 10:45 AM -0800 Howard Chuhyc@symas.com wrote:
They need to be unique per *server*, not per database.
Oh, hm... I thought it was for helping identify a given syncrepl instance in a server with multiple DBs. Certainly in 2.3, you could use the same rid for syncrepl across multiple servers without issue. Is this a change for 2.4?
You're misunderstanding, and no, this is not a change in 2.4 relative to 2.3. "Unique per server" means every syncrepl instance in a given server must have a unique rid.