Who is this Quanah guy who keeps coming out with the wrong info? ;)
On 2/9/08, Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Saturday, February 09, 2008 9:27 AM -0800 James Hartley james.hartley@gmail.com wrote:
ah very good.... The documentaion I read seems to imply the number was tied to the replica, ie if the slave one used rid 001 then slave2 would use rid002.
According to your email
I would need rid001 for database 1 and rid002 for database 2 in the conf file for slave 1 and if I had another slave, say slave2 I would need to have an rid003 and rid004.
Thank you for clarifying this point.
Keep replies on the list. And no, you are incorrect still. The RIDs need to be unique per database, on a given replica. So rid001 and rid002 on replica1, rid001 and rid002 on replica2, is just fine.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Saturday, February 09, 2008 7:12 PM +0000 Gavin Henry gavin.henry@gmail.com wrote:
Who is this Quanah guy who keeps coming out with the wrong info? ;)
It was perfectly correct for James' configuration. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
openldap-software@openldap.org