On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:41:29PM +0100, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
I can file an ITS if need be, but I thought I'd ask before doing so. Maybe my configuration is wrong or I have missed a piece of documentation explaining why my configuration doesn't work.
I suggest you file an ITS. The reason for this double free is that the cleanup call of slapo-rwm deletes the filterstr set by slapo-rwm and replaces it with the original one. However, the translucent_search() call subsequently sets the now deleted pointer to slapo-rwm's filterstr into the operation structure.
This needs to be reworked, and the ITS will allow to track this rework.
Thanks for your imput (Howard too). I filed an ITS against this issue (ITS 5941).
Thanks again,
Bryan