On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:32:56 -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:33 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:07 AM +0300 Pavlos Parissis p_pavlos@freemail.gr wrote:
Hi,
During performance testing with SLAMD we noticed the dncache exceeds the limit. As a result the system starts to swap a lot and the responses of slapd are very slow.
[...snip...]
olmBDBEntryCache: 398306 olmBDBDNCache: 482001 <<========== olmBDBIDLCache: 449999
Sounds like a bug to me, have you filed an ITS?
Actually, please read ITS#5721:
Well, when I sent the mail this ITS wasn't there.
But, how long is that "temporarily" ? In my case it was 32000 entries more than the limit. Isn't it too dangerous to have that "termporarily" period?
Cheers, Pavlos