Hello,
That was a great explation.Simple and Succinct.Too bad it did not come from stupid RH folks.I am sorry I did not get it. What exactly you mean by "RH is not building OpenLADP for running as a server"? I feel like I am being cheated by RH for duping me to buy expensive RH boxes. Red Hat support is terrible as far as LDAP is concerd.I wish there will be a update only subscription available for RHEL.
Thanks
Joy
On 2/2/08, Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com wrote:
--On February 1, 2008 7:56:03 PM -0200 Andreas Hasenack ahasenack@terra.com.br wrote:
I'm curious: why do all these people who purchased (expensive) RH server licenses don't open bug reports with Redhat about their openldap packages?
RH is not building OpenLDAP for running as a server. RH is building OpenLDAP for providing client libraries. They spend months testing that all of the things that link to these libraries work. To upgrade/change the versions of those libraries would take many months of testing and cost lots of money. There are basically two very different sets of goals at work. (1) The goal of RH to provide a set of stable client libraries and (2) the goal of LDAP server admins to have a stable LDAP server.
Those desiring (2) need to build and maintain their own packages, or rely on the packages of another who has the same goal as they do. This situation is not unique to RH, either. It just happens that its wide-scale usage brings this problem up with their packages more than other vendors.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration