Arunachalam Parthasarathy wrote:
Hello,
Can I know the reason why it is not implemented?
Yes.
Basically, it's an operation that is not atomic in pure LDAP (namely, it requires more than a write operation), and thus it could be implemented in many different ways (I mean: handling errors and conflicts in many different ways). So there should be:
1) a need for it
2) an agreed specification about how to do it
3) someone who codes it.
I recall seeing some old specification (e.g. <draft-armijo-ldap-treedelete>, expired 2001). A much better approach would be to use LDAP transactions (e.g. <draft-zeilenga-ldap-txn>) so that the operation either fails or succeeds atomically. In OpenLDAP there's experimental support for transactions, but I'm not sure subtree deletion can be performed right now.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it ---------------------------------------