Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
SASL Binds do not use a DN in the Bind request, therefore you don't need the -D option (and anything you provide there is ignored by the server).
Hmm, since this issue is raised quite often how about handle this more clearly?
If -D is only appropriate for simple bind the command-line tools could check whether -D is used and then give a hint that -x is to be used. Or simply imply simple bind automagically. Same for -U. etc.
Maybe I'm missing something.
There are cases where a client might desire to send a bind DN with a SASL password. The protocol specification does not preclude this. The (new) protocol specification does say servers are to ignore any bind DN presented, but IIRC some don't ignore it.
I would suggest that specifying simple Bind arguments when SASL is selected (by lack of -x) only lead to a warning, not an error (unless there is an override flag).
Filed ITS#5753 which trys to make it possible to explicitly specify -D together with SASL bind but still assume -x (simple bind) automagically for a single -D.
Ciao, Michael.