On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Dave Horsfall wrote:
I tested and verified that this error has been fixed since the 2.3.32 release. If you upgrade, you should not encounter this problem in the future.
Thanks, Quanah; I'll look at upgrading on the morrow.
I confirm that 2.3.35 indeed fixes the problem.
Is there any reason why 2.3.35 has not been flagged as STABLE? I see I'm not the only one bound by policy :-)
Of course, if there's bugs in 2.3.35 then I'd like to know about them...