Alexey Melnikov writes:
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> One question about the WG charter: Stick to features with existing
> implementations, or consider significant new invention, or leave
> that choice open?
I would think that the choice is open at the moment. If you have some
suggestions (in either category), now would be a good time to mention them.
No, just curious at the moment. Workflow and results can be rather
different for the two.