We do have test suites defined by opengroup which most of the directory
vendors follow. Would that be sufficient? or should we define new test
suites as part of this exercise?
--jaimon
Kurt Zeilenga wrote, On 01/11/2008 11:33 AM:
Anyone interest in proposing some LDAP interop testing?
-- Kurt
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Lisa Dusseault <ldusseault(a)commerce.net>
> Date: January 9, 2008 5:13:17 PM PST
> To: Apps Discuss <discuss(a)apps.ietf.org>
> Cc: Lisa Dusseault's Chairs <lisa-dusseault-chairs(a)tools.ietf.org>,
> chris-newman-chairs(a)tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Call for interop proposals
> List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols
> <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
>
>
> At the Apps area open meeting in Vancouver, Chris & I mentioned the
> possibility of doing a day of interoperability events at the next IETF
> meeting. This would replace a day of Apps area meetings during the
> normal meeting hours and in the normal meeting location. Ideally it
> would allow people to come to the IETF for more than just "their"
> meeting (although we have always hoped they can attend other WG
> meetings as well) and participants may get more benefit and better
> justification for attending.
>
> If we're going to do this, we need proposals: what topic ( IDs, RFCs,
> suites or functionality) will be tested. I don't think interops will
> need a lot of management but volunteer coordinators would be ideal.
> Proposals will need to be followed quickly by some indications of who
> will participate. WG scheduling is already open and we need to tell
> the Secretariat immediately if they need to reserve a day for interops.
>
> Proposals should probably be posted on some relevant subject mailing
> list to quickly generate discussion among potential participants --
> not everybody reads Apps Discuss.
>
> Thanks,
> Lisa
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext(a)ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext