Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Kurt Zeilenga writes:
>Amongst other factors in determining whether to approve this BOF,
>they will need to be convinced that there is sufficient level of
>participation in the BOF and the proposed WG.
I'd participate in the WG's mailinglist and hopefully some WG meeting,
but probably not this BOF.
One question about the WG charter: Stick to features with existing
implementations, or consider significant new invention, or leave
that choice open?
I would think that the choice is open at the moment. If you have some
suggestions (in either category), now would be a good time to mention them.