16 Sep
2008
16 Sep
'08
9:47 a.m.
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Kurt Zeilenga writes:
Amongst other factors in determining whether to approve this BOF, they will need to be convinced that there is sufficient level of participation in the BOF and the proposed WG.
I'd participate in the WG's mailinglist and hopefully some WG meeting, but probably not this BOF.
One question about the WG charter: Stick to features with existing implementations, or consider significant new invention, or leave that choice open?
I would think that the choice is open at the moment. If you have some suggestions (in either category), now would be a good time to mention them.