Hi
Howard Chu wrote:
> Mike Jackson wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Dieter Klünter <dieter@dkluenter.de>:
>>>
>>> The attribute type is openLDAPaci. The model is based on
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ldapext-acl-model-08
>>>
>>
>> Does this FAQ-O-Matic still represent the current situation regarding
>> the semantics and not recommended for general use?
>
> Yes.
Given the power of OpenLDAP ACLs in the normal configuration I also do not see
any real need for in-directory ACLs anymore. set-based ACLs could be a bit
faster though (see my other posting). :-)
Ciao, Michael.