Hello Michael,

Thanks for your answer.
My versions are:
On the master I have this kind of entries:
   id    |             dn              | oc_map_id | parent | keyval 
---------+-----------------------------+-----------+--------+---------
       1 | dc=lnp                      |         1 |      0 |       1
       2 | ou=31,dc=lnp                |         2 |      1 |       1
       3 | ou=32,dc=lnp                |         2 |      1 |       2
       4 | ou=33,dc=lnp                |         2 |      1 |       3
       5 | cn=Manager,dc=lnp           |         5 |      1 |       1
       6 | uid=0616286400,ou=31,dc=lnp |         3 |      2 | 1283841
       7 | uid=0616615430,ou=31,dc=lnp |         3 |      2 | 1283842
       8 | uid=0644180200,ou=31,dc=lnp |         3 |      2 | 1283843
       9 | uid=0618279414,ou=31,dc=lnp |         3 |      2 | 1283844

And the entry "ou=31,dc=lnp" exists like shown in the picture in attachment.

Thanks for your help.
Frederic


2009/4/21 Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Frederic Bouy wrote:
>
> For performance issues (millions or records) I have two ldap servers:
> - one master with an sql backend (postgres) to allow easy data manipulation
> - one slave to anwer ldap queries and provide good response time

Which OpenLDAP version is this?

> syncrepl rid=001
> [..]
>         searchbase="ou=31,dc=lnp"
                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Does this entry exist on your master?

Ciao, Michael.