Hi Quanah!
Did NOT know that tool!
Thanks again! Great info.
MJ
Op 06-07-2023 om 22:06 schreef Quanah Gibson-Mount:
>
>
> --On Thursday, July 6, 2023 3:44 PM +0200 cYuSeDfZfb cYuSeDfZfb
> <cyusedfzfb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Quanah,
>>
>>
>> Thanks again for your answer.
>>
>>
>> From what you have written, we understand now that we should not aim for
>> four identical timestamps in contextCSN attributes on each node. As
>> contextCSN is updated (as you said) only when a server receives a direct
>> write. (and NOT for writes received through replication)
>>
>>
>> So, as long as the contextCSN output across all four MM-ldap nodes is
>> identical, replication is doing it's thing.
>>
>>
>> Specifically, from my original post:
>>> contextCSN: 20230622151102.137085Z#000000#001#000000
>>> contextCSN: 20230622151105.174343Z#000000#002#000000
>>> contextCSN: 20230627112536.529432Z#000000#0dd#000000
>>> contextCSN: 20230627112536.529512Z#000000#0de#000000
>>
>>
>> The first two servers (001/002) are just as up-to-date as the last two,
>> only: more recent writes have come into the cluster through the 0de/0dd
>> servers.
>>
>>
>> I have written a script to compare actual ldap served content, and that
>> confirms that they all serve the same data.
>>
>>
>> If any of the above is wrong, I'd appreciate to be corrected :-)
>
> If you were using delta-syncrepl (I see from your configs you are not)
> you'd also need to do comparisons on the CSNs in the accesslog DB.
>
> If you use the Symas OpenLDAP packages, there's also a nice utility
> called slapd-watcher that shows you the status of your servers included
> in their builds.
>
> --Quanah
>
>
>