Thanks Michael,

But instead of changing existing class, i think, it will be better if we create a custom auxiliary class.

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Michael Ströder <> wrote:
Vikas Parashar wrote:
> Yes, that should be. Because, you are using two structural class from
> different chain.
> Instead of account class, please use extensibleObject.

Using 'extensibleObject' is really bad practice.

Hint: One can easily define custom structural object classes adding the
attributes needed.

Also object classes can be derived from two other object classes.

SUP ( inetOrgPerson $ account )

Ciao, Michael.