--On Monday, September 04, 2017 11:33 AM +0200 Ulrich Windl
<Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

>>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com> schrieb am 01.09.2017 um 21:58
>>>> in
> Nachricht <2032476F3CBBE8B34FB96BAD@[192.168.1.30]>:

>> --On Friday, September 01, 2017 11:48 AM -0400 Douglas Duckworth
>> <dod2014@med.cornell.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>

>>> Vinyl records are back in style.  So it seems slapd.conf and bdb.
>>

>> Yeah, I got to spend 2+ hours with a customer today because they chose
>> to  use back-bdb, and it lacks subtree rename... so something that
>> should have  been trivial to resolve was a long drawn out process.
>> There are good  reasons things have progressed beyond slapd.conf and
>> back-bdb.
>

> I wonder: Aren't both mdb and bdb key-value databases? So if one backend
> implements a subtree rename, the other could do it as well. I think it's
> nor fair to blame BDB itself for that...

back-hdb supports subtree rename.  Pay attention to the difference between
back-bdb and back-hdb, both which sit on top of BDB.

--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:

<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.symas.com&d=DwICAg&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9-RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=2Fzhh_78OGspKQpl_e-CbhH6xUjnRkaqPFUS2wTJ2cw&m=WmwoyUOPXDE8GHw4h-NuBEidgQPN6jTRQs_xA0Fm-NM&s=c1SywnbtcEvvlu6yLxToeeC3Ckjr392inXrymwgMLBs&e=>