Hi!

Sorry for this stupid question:

One argument for delta-syncrepl is that changing a small part of a large object is much more efficient, because pnly the changed data is logged and transferred.

However with a multi-valued attributer like pwdHistory the accesslog entry contains all the unchanged values also. E.g.:

…

reqMod: pwdHistory:+ 20260207170142Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#65#{SSHA256

}i56N/G7DutJ3OWdRXDBlSa/7CFN8XLM9X92RwUWohvQiQIEx+cVu9Q==

…

reqMod: modifyTimestamp:= 20260207170142Z

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20240528115526Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}caF

961AUsh/ECAMdR2i/Iu+DS9Wi22z2

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20240528115715Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}RSu

8pPgFNIuDP/lBK1qylW+z5aEsr9hD

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20240902115523Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}B8H

FVqRKEheQWDonlsu6cyyMH4SNaQOz

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20241018115412Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}9/R

BrtPynf5D0cU+R1OGt+ZrdIK4mo0N

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20241203075815Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}raC

wwHLscnDFG0SwoH9MBbqI2CCfMlzX

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20250115093324Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}iMd

Qy6jvjwtQQXp5JZmAbLovyFsN1b8J

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20250124090328Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}2wQ

4+aXKqOZC1w3uKULFeJ8kleum4Iy6

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20250306085113Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}aXQ

4DutidnaPGBiitGVAMv8Ebb8YMOOc

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20250528131341Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}YDh

Hw94sp0wdjWu9xzm4DKzpUioi5Wqf

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20250822074239Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#38#{SSHA}Nog

FGndg4AiHJEN59Is0JjLgFEx6TQr1

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20250924074514Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#65#{SSHA256}

lV7mACHa1hPG0RT7EzKM47+EzTz+xamL8+hx72FIG390xyRdnIqkwg==

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20250929123923Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#65#{SSHA256}

kF37AmFjBZFrKeLVjQdemDTi6joE96s4FBhiSqejdSPLdosJVz2YZw==

reqOld: pwdHistory: 20251118085003Z#1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40#65#{SSHA256}

f3eB5YSh/xdak80b/eVARKlo/f+vsbD4EbNFv/sfrpbSo2bGfNct6Q==

Doesn’t that “cancel” the gain in efficiency?

Kind regards,

Ulrich Windl