From unix.gurus@gmail.com Tue Apr 3 21:04:58 2007 From: unix.gurus@gmail.com To: openldap-bugs@openldap.org Subject: Re: (ITS#4907) Syncrepl consumer failing to perform deletes Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:04:57 +0000 Message-ID: <200704032104.l33L4vHQ011954@boole.openldap.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0728870377562515719==" --===============0728870377562515719== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=3D_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On 4/2/07, Howard Chu wrote: > > > I am attempting to set up syncrepl between two OpenLDAP 2.3.32servers. A= dds > > and Modifies are replicated from the provider to the consumer, but > deletes > > result in thousands of "unknown filter type 136644788" messages in the > consumer > > log and no deletion. Commenting out the syncprov-sessionlog directive > works > > around the issue. > > I don't see this with 2.3.32 on Linux 2.6.18. You'll probably need to > trace the activity with gdb to see what's wrong with the filter. Right you are. The patch for ITS#4638 (rejected here: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200608/msg00043.html) introduced the bug. I'll send in a corrected patch once it has been QA'd. --=20 Thanks, Sean Burford ------=3D_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921 Content-Type: text/html; charset=3DISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

On 4/2/07, Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com= > wrote:
> I am attempting to set up syncrepl between two OpenLDAP 2.3.32 servers.&= nbsp; Adds
> and Modifies are replicated from the provider to the = consumer, but deletes
> result in thousands of "unknown filter typ= e 136644788" messages in the consumer
> log and no deletion.  Commenting out the syncprov-sessionl= og directive works
> around the issue.

I don't see this with= 2.3.32 on Linux 2.6.18. You'll probably need to
trace the activity wi= th gdb to see what's wrong with the filter.

Right you are.  The patch for ITS#4638 (rejected here: http://www.openld= ap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200608/msg00043.html) introduced the bug. = ; I'll send in a corrected patch once it has been QA'd.

--
Thanks,
Sean Burford ------=3D_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921-- --===============0728870377562515719==--